Provide a written rebuttal of at least 300 words on your partner’s video post against solitary confinement.
Your rebuttal must be founded in at least one reference in the course literature or other literature you wish to introduce to support your position. This reference will be noted the resource list you will submit to the instructor Due Sunday of Week 7.rebuttal to the paragraph below…
Solitary confinement is presented as a measure to keep inmates and staff safe, but when we look beyond the surface, it becomes clear that solitary is more than just restrictive—it’s damaging.
The conditions and the mental toll solitary confinement takes on inmates are difficult to justify, especially when we consider that it is meant to rehabilitate behaviors and keep people safe, not destroy mental health.Scientific research shows that solitary confinement leads to sensory deprivation and social isolation, causing significant changes in the brain (Psychology Today, 2019).
Prolonged isolation reduces hippocampal function, which affects memory and learning, while increasing activity in the amygdala, heightening fear responses. Instead of rehabilitating individuals, solitary leaves them more vulnerable, struggling with basic cognitive and emotional functions—ultimately making it harder to reintegrate into society, or even the general prison population.
The ethical implications for those who work within the solitary system are equally troubling. Social workers and helping professionals are caught in a moral dilemma—they’re called upon to protect and serve individuals who are subjected to conditions proven to be harmful. Dr. Ali Winters (2019) discusses the inherent conflict for professionals asked to balance client welfare against the punitive environment of solitary. Dr. Winters outlines specific dangers, including the increased risk of severe psychological harm, ethical conflicts involving dual loyalty, and the challenge of providing meaningful care in an environment designed to isolate and punish.Fortunately, alternatives do exist. The Mandela Rules emphasize humane treatment, structured rehabilitation programs, and alternatives to isolation like restorative justice (APT, 2024). The Vera Institute advocates for evidence-based practices, such as therapeutic housing units and step-down programs, to reduce reliance on solitary while promoting inmate safety and positive behavior (Vera Institute, 2024). The Social Workers Against Solitary Confinement Task Force is also taking a stand, actively seeking to end this practice by supporting policies that respect human rights (Berthold, Buser, & Atkinson, 2024).It’s time to recognize that solitary confinement does not rehabilitate—it only breaks people down.
Alternatives that emphasize mental health support, human dignity, and rehabilitation are not just theoretical; they are practical, proven solutions. We must push for change and support these humane approaches. Let’s prioritize a justice system that uplifts rather than one that dehumanizes, working towards rehabilitation, safety, and ultimately, a better society for us all
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|