Evaluate the quality of the two arguments given above and explain which argument is stronger and why. Justify your position, not with opinion, but with an analysis of the quality of the evidence and reasoning.Address questions such as: How well supported are the argument’s premises? How strongly does the conclusion follow from the premises? Are there any issues that affect the quality of the argument? How might someone with a different point of view object to the argument?Analyze which argument is stronger than the other and explain why. Justify your position, not with opinion, but with your analysis of the quality of the evidence and reasoning.Presentation of your own approach to addressing the issue (approximately 200 words): Based on what you have learned, present an argument for what you think is the best approach to solving/addressing this issue. Your argument can refer to a solution to this difficult problem or to a specific way you can contribute meaningfully to help with this cause. For example, if your topic is homelessness, you could address the best societal-level way to reduce homelessness or the best (most effective) way that you can help others find housing.Addressing an objection to your chosen approach (approximately 300 words): Present what you think is the best possible objection to your argument/approach to the issue and your best reply to this objection (e.g., How might you overcome any potential concerns or negative side-effects from your chosen approach?) Cite a scholarly or other credible source in this section (either in your presentation of the objection or in your response to it).Conclusion (approximately 150 words): Summarize what you have learned about how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers. Discuss how a critical-thinking based approach could help address and contribute to solving this issue.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|