This project has three tasks, each representing a different facet of the role of the professional educator.
Task 1 evaluates your ability to recognize and respond to violations of the Texas Educator Code of Ethics.
Task 2 evaluates your ability to communicate professionally and appropriately with parents.
Task 3 evaluates your ability to respond appropriately to your colleagues. Your paper will be evaluated on multiple criteria, including your thorough response to each of the prompts and your ability to write professionally.
To successfully complete this project and avoid resubmission, you must review the rubric with which you are evaluated.
You will submit your responses to each of the tasks in one document. The Canvas grading system does not recognize two or more documents within a submission – it only sees the first document. This is why all three parts must be in one document.
You must use the TNT 700.1P Professional Communications Response Guide to respond and submit.
Here is a short example Download short exampleproject for you to review to understand what is expected to pass this project.
NT 700.1P Professional Communications and Ethical Behaviors
TNT 700.1P Professional Communications and Ethical Behaviors
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePART 1: Educator Code of Ethics Identification of Behavior
8 pts
Exemplary
Behavior that is or could be an issue is explicitly identified from each scenario.
7 pts
Proficient
Behavior that is or could be an issue is generally identified from each scenario.
5 pts
Developing
Behavior that is or could be an issue is too vague or not correctly identified for one or the other scenario.
3 pts
Novice
Behavior that is or could be an issue not correctly identified for either scenario.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard(s) Cited and Justification
8 pts
Exemplary
Standards are explicitly cited by number and letter. A coherent and cogent statement is provided that explicitly and clearly aligns and connects the behavior to the standard believed to be violated.
7 pts
Proficient
Standards are cited by a general description. Justification is provided but it doesn’t explicitly align and connect the behavior to the standard believed to be violated.
5 pts
Developing
Standards are not correctly cited for one of the scenarios. Justification is not provided, or it doesn’t align and connect the behavior to the standard believed to be violated for one of the scenarios.
3 pts
Novice
Standards are not correctly cited for either of the scenarios. Justification is not provided, or it doesn’t align and connect the behavior to the standard believed to be violated for either of the scenarios.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlternative Behavior
8 pts
Exemplary
Intern provides a detailed and appropriate approach that could be taken by the teachers in the scenario, so no standards are violated.
7 pts
Proficient
Intern provides a general description of an alternative approach that could be taken by the teachers in the scenario, so no standards are violated.
5 pts
Developing
Intern does not provide a different approach that could be taken by the teachers so that no standards are violated in one of the scenarios.
3 pts
Novice
Intern does not provide a different approach that could be taken by the teachers so that no standards are violated in either of the scenarios.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePART 2: Effective Communication with Parents
8 pts
Exemplary
Response consistently and thoroughly utilizes effective communication skills and calm tone.
7 pts
Proficient
Response utilizes effective communication skills and has calm tone.
5 pts
Developing
Response utilizes some effective communication skills but may include some phrases or language that are not conducive to professional communication.
3 pts
Novice
Response lacks evidence of effective communication skills, and/or includes unprofessional language.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcerns Addressed
8 pts
Exemplary
The concerns are fully addressed in a manner that blends respect with assertiveness.
7 pts
Proficient
The concerns are addressed in a respectful manner.
5 pts
Developing
Concerns are partially addressed. Manner may need improvement.
3 pts
Novice
Concerns are not addressed or are done so in a derogatory manner.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePART 3: Relations with Colleagues Identification of Inappropriate Behavior and Alternatives
8 pts
Exemplary
Inappropriate behavior and any alternate behavior needed correctly identified and fully explained.
7 pts
Proficient
Inappropriate behavior and any alternate behavior needed correctly identified and explained.
5 pts
Developing
Explanation of inappropriate behavior and any alternate behaviors lacking detail.
3 pts
Novice
Inadequate or incorrect explanation of inappropriate behavior and any alternate behaviors.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Next Steps
8 pts
Exemplary
Next steps are explained and explicitly include elements of effective communication.
7 pts
Proficient
Next steps are explained and include elements of effective communication.
5 pts
Developing
Explanation of next steps is vague and may not include elements of effective communication.
3 pts
Novice
Explanation of next steps is missing or incorrect and may not include elements of effective communication.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|