A Critically discuss Essay about: “Law and jurisprudence are not based on values of neutrality and objectivity but are defined from a male perspective and based on male values.”

Structure and needed OSCOLA footnote refrencce

1. Introduction

Define the key terms**: Explain “law and jurisprudence,” “neutrality,” “objectivity,” and “male perspective and values.” Relate these terms to the context of feminist jurisprudence.
– **State the thesis**: Clearly outline your position on the statement (e.g., agreeing, disagreeing, or partially agreeing). Indicate that you will critically analyze the argument using feminist perspectives.
– **Outline the structure**: Briefly state what each section will address.
—

2. Contextual Background

 

– **Historical Development of Law and Jurisprudence**:
– Discuss the historical dominance of men in legal professions, lawmaking, and jurisprudential theory.
– Highlight how the legal system emerged within patriarchal societies.
– **Foundations of Feminist Jurisprudence**:
– Introduce key feminist thinkers (e.g., Catharine MacKinnon, Carol Smart) and their critiques of the law’s claim to neutrality and objectivity.

3. The Argument: Law is Defined from a Male Perspective
– **Critique of Neutrality and Objectivity**:
– Explain how the concepts of neutrality and objectivity can mask male biases.

– Use examples such as property law, family law, and criminal law (e.g., laws on rape, domestic violence) to show how laws reflect male experiences and values.

– **Analysis of Male-Dominated Legal Institutions**:

– Discuss the underrepresentation of women in judiciary and legal professions historically and its influence on jurisprudence.
– **Illustrative Examples**:
– Highlight specific legal doctrines or cases that reveal a male-centric bias, e.g., treatment of reproductive rights, workplace harassment laws, or “reasonable man” standards in tort law.
—

4. Counterarguments: Exploring Nuances

 

– **Progress Toward Inclusivity**:
– Acknowledge recent changes aimed at incorporating women’s perspectives in lawmaking and jurisprudence.
– Discuss contributions of feminist movements in reshaping family law, criminal law, and international human rights law.
– **Objective Legal Principles**:
– Address arguments that some legal principles (e.g., due process, rule of law) aim for fairness and neutrality regardless of gender.
– **Criticism of Feminist Jurisprudence**:
– Mention criticisms that feminist perspectives can sometimes overlook intersectionality or essentialize women’s experiences.
—

5. Rebuttal: Responses to Counterarguments

 

– **Limitations of Progress**:
– Argue that systemic biases persist despite advancements, often in subtle or structural forms.
– **Questioning Objectivity**:
– Reiterate feminist critiques that “objectivity” often operates within a framework of implicit male norms.
– **Intersectionality**:
– Incorporate Kimberlé Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality to argue that law also fails other marginalized groups, further illustrating a lack of true neutrality.
—

### **6. Theoretical Contributions**

 

– **Feminist Legal Theories**:
– Highlight theoretical contributions such as:
– **Liberal Feminism**: Advocating for equal access to legal institutions.
– **Radical Feminism**: Viewing law as a tool of male domination.
– **Postmodern Feminism**: Deconstructing legal language and exposing male-centric assumptions.
– **Comparative Approaches**:
– Discuss examples from non-Western feminist jurisprudence, emphasizing cultural contexts.
—
7. Conclusion
– **Restate Key Arguments**: Summarize the main points supporting and critiquing the statement.
– **Conclude Your Position**: Offer a nuanced conclusion that recognizes the complexity of the issue.
– **Suggest Further Questions**: Propose areas for further inquiry, such as how intersectionality or queer theory could expand the critique of legal neutrality.
—
**Tips for Writing**

1. **Engage with Core Texts**: Refer to key works in feminist jurisprudence and critique traditional jurisprudential theories (e.g., those by H.L.A. Hart, Ronald Dworkin) from feminist perspectives.
2. **Use Case Studies**: Anchor theoretical arguments in real-world examples or landmark cases to make your essay more compelling.
*Margaret Davies, “Feminism and Gender in Legal Theory” in Asking the Law Question, (Lawbook Co., 2002)
*Carol Smart, “The Quest for a Feminist Jurisprudence” in Feminism and the Power of Law (Routledge, 1989)
*Kimberle Crenshaw ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex’ (1989) The University of Chicago Legal Forum 139.
MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory,“ (1982) Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 515
Cinzia Arruzza, Tithi Bhattacharya, and Nancy Fraser, ‘Notes for a Feminist Manifesto’, (2018) 114 New Left Review 113
3. **Adopt a Critical Tone**: Evaluate arguments from multiple angles, but ensure your position is well-supported by evidence.
4. **Incorporate Intersectionality**: Avoid presenting a monolithic view of women’s experiences with the law.
5. **Ensure Coherence**: Use clear transitions between sections and maintain a logical flow.
This approach will enable you to critically engage with the question and provide a balanced, insightful essay.
————————-
Sources needed to mention
**Books and Articles**
1. **Catharine A. MacKinnon**:
– *Toward a Feminist Theory of the State* (1989): Explores how laws reinforce male dominance and perpetuate gender inequality.
– *Feminism Unmodified* (1987): Discusses the male-centric nature of legal neutrality and objectivity.
2. **Carol Smart**:
– *Feminism and the Power of Law* (1989): Critiques the assumption of neutrality in law and explores how the legal system marginalizes women’s perspectives.
3. **Kimberlé Crenshaw**:
– *Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex* (1989): Introduces the concept of intersectionality, showing how law fails to address overlapping forms of discrimination.
4. **Noreen Burrows and Michelle Herman**:
– *Feminist Perspectives on Law* (1993): A collection of essays examining the ways in which law reflects patriarchal values.
5. **Susan Moller Okin**:
– *Justice, Gender, and the Family* (1989): Argues that legal systems and societal structures are inherently biased against women.
6. **Joan W. Scott**:
– *Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis* (1986): Explores how gender operates within social and legal systems.
7. **Nicola Lacey**:
– *Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory* (1998): Discusses the challenges feminist jurisprudence poses to traditional legal theory.

**Journals and Articles**
1. **”Feminist Legal Theories”**:
– Margaret Davies, *Law and Critique* (1994): Provides an overview of different feminist legal theories and their critiques of mainstream jurisprudence.
2. **”The Rule of Law and Feminist Jurisprudence”**:
– Ngaire Naffine, *Legal Studies* (1990): Examines how feminist critiques challenge the traditional rule of law.
3. **”Law’s Patriarchy”**:
– Janet Halley, *The Yale Law Journal* (1990): Critiques the patriarchal structure of legal doctrines and institutions.
4. **”Equality, Objectivity, and Neutrality in Law”**:
– Martha Minow, *Harvard Law Review* (1987): Discusses the myths of neutrality in legal reasoning.
—
**Case Studies and Legal Documents**
1. **Landmark Cases**:
– *R v R* (1991): A case in the UK that changed legal perspectives on marital rape, reflecting feminist critiques.
– *Roe v. Wade* (1973): Illustrates the legal battles around women’s reproductive rights and male-dominated jurisprudence.
– *Brown v. Board of Education* (1954): Although not gender-specific, useful to explore intersectional critiques of neutrality.
2. **United Nations Documents**:
– *Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)*: Demonstrates international recognition of gender biases in legal systems.
—
**Theoretical Frameworks**
1. **H.L.A. Hart**:
– *The Concept of Law* (1961): Though not feminist, useful for contrasting feminist critiques with traditional legal positivism.
2. **Ronald Dworkin**:
– *Law’s Empire* (1986): Offers a framework of law that feminist theorists often critique for its supposed neutrality.
3. **Michel Foucault**:
– *Discipline and Punish* (1975): While not specific to feminism, his theories of power can be applied to understand the structural domination within law.
—
**Additional Resources**
– **Feminist Legal Studies Journal**: Regularly publishes articles on feminist critiques of legal systems.
– **Harvard Law Review**: Often contains debates on the intersection of gender, law, and social theory.

Last Completed Projects